|
Previous
Two Issues and AI Conversation Previous
Two Issues and AI Conversation
Previous Two Issues and AI Conversation
Previous
Two Issues and AI Conversation
Previous
Two Issues and AI Conversation Previous
Two Issues and AI Conversation Previous
Two Issues and AI Conversation Previous
Two Issues and AI Conversation Previous Two Issues and AI Conversation |
"History
is just people doing things" THE ABQ
CORRESPONDENT
ISSN 1087-2302 Online Edition Number
370.....October 2026 Published since 1985 for clients
and contacts of ABQ Communications Corporation, the fuzzy focus of The
ABQ Correspondent is "the impact of new technology on
society." If you'd like to receive email notification when each
monthly issue is posted, please let us know.
correspo at swcp
dot com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MMMMM…MAYBE The
St. Louis PBS station recently ran a piece titled Meet
huitlacoche, a gnarly corn fungus that's now gracing plates in St. Louis by Kate Grumke. In my sheltered life I had never encountered huitlacoche, and
was repelled to discover that it’s better known in the US as “corn smut,”
a sort of plant cancer…”uncontrolled growth of corn tissue”…considered a
plague by Europe-oriented American farmers. (My French mother-in-law cooked
brains in our house perhaps twice, and she and my wife enjoyed them, but the
gagging reaction of our hamburger-and-potatoes-oriented kids prevented
further experiments along those lines. No, none for me either, thank you,
gastronomic coward that I am.) Actually, the idea of trying some hideously
expensive corn smut improves on reading another
article by Alejandre Graf, who
sensibly refers to these things as “Mexican truffles.” Her
instructions for preparation include unsettling lines like “cut away the
huitlacoche galls”…galls?...and “don’t soak in water, as it can turn mushy.”
Heaven forefend. I guess it really comes back to the term “smut.” Hard for us
WASPs to cope with. Come to think on it, how did somebody figure out that
parts of an artichoke are edible? GRAND FINALE Ondine
steered us to a fascinating 55-minute video explaining in baby talk we can follow part of the stupefyingly
complex process of manufacturing integrated circuit chips. I’d first learned about
semiconductor chip production from an excellent article in Business
Week in about 1958 when transistors were still novel. This
current video recalls an anecdote from what must have been 1968, when the
lower San Francisco Peninsula was becoming Silicon Valley (though our house
was in Sunnyvale, the Cupertino High School athletic field was over our back
fence). The
electronics industry had just got beyond the stage of manufacturing
discrete transistors, and was making rapid progress with integrated
circuits. One of the leading companies in the field was having a problem
so stressful that they were willing to try any desperate measure to fix it.
Somehow they got an impression that our little company might be able to help,
and we were invited to a meeting at which (with strong NDAs and threats in
place) they showed us their super-secret final step in producing chips. These
decades later, the NDA probably has little force, so here’s what they were
doing: Like
everybody else, they first made a pure silicon wafer. At the time, a
big wafer was about 2¼ inches in diameter. (The wafers in the video
look to be about 10 inches in diameter.) They coated the wafer with photoresist, and projected an image of the circuitry they wanted onto the wafer…typically neat rows of square images that became individual chips. After a series of miraculous high tech, precise operations, they had what amounted to a 2¼-inch piece of glass with hundreds of circuits printed on its surface. The remaining critical step was to break those individual circuits apart. If you’ve ever cut a piece of glass into
separate pieces…even with curved shapes…you’ve probably been surprised to
learn that you’re not supposed to “cut” the glass with that odd
instrument you bought at the hardware store, but to “scratch” the surface
of the glass as lightly as possible, maintaining a continuous line from
one edge of the glass to another. Then, you tap the glass lightly, and, if
you’re lucky, the pieces on both sides of that scratch separate cleanly.
It takes practice and some bleeding to learn the art of doing this
consistently, and a skilled practitioner is impressive to watch. Our
hosts showed us how they did this with the wafers, First, they dragged a
diamond with a sharp point along each row in each direction, making the
scratches along which the wafer was to be broken. Then came the
“tap”…and this was their big secret step after the many marvels of modern
technology in the process that preceded it. A
technician placed the wafer on a piece of heated waxed paper, so that when
the chips broke apart, they would stick to the paper without scattering. Then she placed a resilient plastic hair curler on the bench, placed the wafer on the curler paper-side-up, and with her hand rolled the wafer firmly over the curler. Then she turned it 90°, and rolled it again. We could hear the wafer breaking…but the second time, it sounded a bit different. “Oh,”
said the technician. “that wasn’t so good.” When she showed us the chips sticking to the waxed paper, sure enough, most of them were separated properly, but the break had not followed the line completely on the second roll, and a depressingly large number of the chips were ruined. The problem, they said, was that the diamond making the scratch sometimes bounced, making the scratch discontinuous. They hadn’t been able to prevent the bounce, and were hoping, because they’d heard we were etching images on a surface with a laser using sub- micron dots, we might be able to draw continuous scratches on the wafers. (Maybe, but it wasn’t a sure thing, and neither we nor they had budget for research.) We didn’t know offhand how to improve their yields. They were happy enough to have all that spectacular technology funnel down to a clever lady with waxed paper and a hair curler, but the bouncing diamond was a real problem. Big stuff depends on a lot of little stuff. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Item: There
are continuing reports of positive effects of installing solar panels in
fields on a large scale. Here’s an example of a technical
paper on the subject. While there’s a certain
amount of upset and arm-waving about “covering perfectly good agricultural
land with ugly solar panels,” apparently, humidity is increased under the
panels, enabling growth of plants, which may be desirable crops. Animals
shelter under the panels, often grazing on those new plants. Solar panels
have their own problems…notably dust that reduces their efficiency, but it
isn’t all one way or the other. Item: We recently tipped our hat to associate/friend Jim Dowe. Might have included this: Jim and I talked so comfortably, that once (before boarding airplanes became such a complicated process) we were at LAX, at the gate, checked in to board our flight home to Albuquerque. We were chatting about something I now forget, and became so much involved in the conversation that we didn't notice that our flight had boarded everybody. The staff had probably looked for us, sitting not far from the gate, but with no response, had flown off without us. With no more flights open we had to spend an extra night in L.A., talking about interesting stuff. I'll miss fifty-some years of that. Item: The use of wind power (without
conventional sails) to propel ships…not replacing other power plants, but
substantially reducing fuel consumption, seems to be making economically
practical progress. Here are several recent
reports; This,
this,
this,
and this.
Kinda reassuring. _________________________________________
ITEM FROM THE PAST This item from the poorly organized Correspo archives, probably the late 1980s, seemed worth
additional commentary. MANUFACTURED
NEWS When three Americans first crossed the Atlantic in a
balloon, the trip was featured on the cover of every major journal in the
world that week.* "Some think we were simply lucky to be
associated with a project that just naturally attracted publicity," says
Jim Mitchell, "but the luck was the product of years of hard work of
which I'm rather proud." Jim was friend and PR man to
late balloonist and mining
executive Maxie Anderson, staging The Beryllium War of the early 60's, for
example. (See LIFE and other magazines of the era.) "Some
members of the launch crew were irritated by the constant presence of prying
reporters," says Jim. "They made it clear that they'd prefer
to launch secretly from a secluded meadow in the Maine woods, then make a
brief announcement to the press in case the balloon happened to make it to
France. Although Mr. Anderson never quite articulated the
sentiment, my clear impression was that without reporters, there wouldn't be
a launch at all. Publicity was not a price, but a goal." When
you see other such examples of dumb luck, you may want to look a little
closer, to learn whose work it is. *Except, Ironically, for the New York
Times, whose staff was on strike. Expanding a bit on
The Beryllium War…Ranchers Exploration and
Development Company here in Albuquerque
(acquired by Hecla a couple of years after Maxie’s
death…falling from a balloon not surprisingly) felt
that mining giant Anaconda had jumped some of
little Ranchers’ claims, and they wanted to do
something about it. Jim Mitchell suggested staging
a very public event that would attract a lot of
attention, showing Ranchers as a brave underdog
taking on a big bully. He then organized what
became known as The Beryllium War, sending in a
number of trucks with crews and materials to stake
formal claims. “The laws said that we couldn’t
sneak into the disputed area surreptitiously,
and the place was full of Anaconda guards,” he
explained. “So, we lined up our trucks, and one moment
after sunrise had them roar into the area. Every so
many yards, we’d toss out shovels, stakes, supplies,
and a college kid who would immediately drive
the stakes officially, and start digging to show
that we were really mining.” The Anaconda guys were
properly surprised, but recovered quickly, and
fights broke out. One of the Ranchers guys, having been
hit improperly, he felt, crawled under a stalled
vehicle with a shovel, and waited until guards walked by.
He could swing the shovel outside the vehicle, and
did…breaking a knee or two. The guards were armed,
but intelligently did not throw down on anybody.
Instead, they fired at the engines of the invading trucks.
Jim had thoughtfully arranged to have reporters
there from major media. When one of the guards shot a
truck radiator, a media photographer just missed the
action. He asked the guard if he could shoot again. The
guy was happy to, and the photographer got a beautiful
picture of the guard, the gun, and a delightful smoke
ring. The picture appeared in some publication like LIFE
or Time. The affair was a great
success from Jim’s point
of view. He was pleased
that when Anaconda and Ranchers had a meeting to
settle things, one of the key Anaconda guys, on seeing
him, said, “So you’re the guy who started the war!” …and you may have
thought Public Relations wasn’t really an exciting
activity. I knew Maxie
slightly, through Jim, and liked him. That picture of him
must have been shot not long before his fatal accident. He
had a problem with a detached retina and was wearing
the eye patch the last time I saw him, outside Little
Anita’s restaurant in Old Town. (Be careful. Sometimes the chile is very hot.) ---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
ISBN 979-8320821917 See
on Amazon __________________________________________________
____________________ Copyright © 2026 ABQ Communications Corporation. All
rights reserved. |