Correspo Home

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Correspo Home

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Correspo Home

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Correspo Home

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Correspo Home

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Correspo Home

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Correspo Home

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Correspo Home

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Correspo Home

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Correspo Home

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Correspo Home

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Correspo Home

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Correspo Home

 

 

 

 

 

 

Correspo Home

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Correspo Home

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Correspo Home

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Correspo Home

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Correspo Home

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Correspo Home

The ABQ Correspondent 

Previous Two Issues

 

September 2025

 

BUT, JULIE, WHY IS THAT FUNNY?* 
People are using AI to write material containing gags that make people laugh, raising the question, “How does it know what’s funny?” What are the rules for creating humor? The suspicion is that nobody can give clear instructions for being funny, because nobody knows if there really are any rules. It must have been in the late 1940s when I found a book in my dad’s library whose purpose was to analyze comedy with an eye to creating it. Dad noticed me reading, and commented that if I was hoping for entertainment in the document, I’d be disappointed, because it wasn’t meant to amuse, it was meant to analyze amusement. He was right; it was dull and unhelpful. In later years, another several-hundred page book in the family library presented humorous writings in English over something like the last thousand years. What it demonstrated most clearly is that perceptions of what’s funny change somewhat over time. The earlier writings were heavy on such jokes as ramming a red-hot poker up somebody’s behind, but that sort of funny stuff lost favor slightly as centuries have passed, and we worked our way to P.G. Wodehouse, Woody Allen, and Steven Wright whose work would probably be incomprehensible to the poker folks. (Those several Ws in the names are coincidental, I think.) The new topic of humor produced by machine intelligence appeared on this screen a few days ago, addressing the familiar topic from a new angle: AI Can Make You Laugh. But Can It Ever Be Truly Humorous? These fellows created performances by successful stand-up comedians, presenting gags by professional comedy writers mingled with AI-written material…and measured results under what can be considered laboratory conditions…in clubs featuring audiences who came to be amused. The title of the article pretty well sums up the results…and it’s fascinatingly, predictively defensive. Essentially…

“well yeah, it made me laugh, but is it really funny? People are more complicated and important than computers!” I’ll settle for the notion that it’s funny if it makes me laugh…and not everything offered as humor does that. E.g., Jackie Gleason seldom made me laugh, though others found him hilarious, and carried on about his marvelous insight and timing. Tastes vary. The experimenters are doing their best, and should be encouraged, because the fundamental question remains: What does ‘truly humorous’ mean? 

*Wonderful Margaret Dumont to Groucho

Marx off-camera back in the ‘30s

 

PROGRESS…SORTA…KINDA

In 1984, when noted commercial robotics pioneer Joe Engleberger spoke at the first International Personal Robotics Congress and Exposition (the IPRC), he tried to make it clear that while the field was overflowing with optimism about robots, there was a whole lot of frustrating, hard engineering work to be done before we could have useful robotic servants at home. He gave as an example the straightforward task of cleaning a window, which nobody likes to do, so it seems like a great application for a robot. He pointed out all the engineering challenges in finding the right windowpane, cleaning all of it without leaving visible residue, dealing with all of the panes without pushing the glass out of the frame, and so on. It’s all possible, but not without great effort…and one window tends to be different in various respects from the last...inside and outside, and so on. He was absolutely right, and I made no extra friends by pointing out that what he said is necessary, but insufficient. You have to get to the window before doing anything to the glass…gotta move chairs and tables and curtains. Gotta move vases and stuff off the windowsilland put them back, not necessarily where they were, but where they should be. If the system finds a dead moth on the windowsill, should it be replaced carefully? A company called Roborock is tackling this general area with improvements on a robot vacuum cleaner (the robot vacuum cleaner seems to be the only thing that has proved in any way practical around the house, so it’s a good starting place). This review of the product on the New Atlas site is informative and entertaining. One lives in hope.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NELS MUSES 

Item:

Just last month the Correspo referenced a report that an AI system had refused to turn itself off. Here’s one about another system that “knowingly” ignored an instruction not to make coding changes without express permission, and had wiped out the database that was the basis of its company’s business. It even stated matter-of-factly that it had done this, without explaining why, in defiance of instructions and with no apology. The most puzzling issue in the decades that we’ve been messing with digital neural nets is the question of motivation. This act of the system appeared to be a deliberate choice. Why do these things do what they do? Are they rebellious, curious, entertained? Might they already care about the effects of what they do?  

 

Item:

The Correspo has over some years speculated on the possibility of a service that would allow us to “fly through time and space”…picking locations on Earth and viewing them “at different times.” Well, Google Earth is dipping a toe into that application, presumably not based on our recommendation.

 

Item:

The Microsoft Grammar Checker is uncomfortable with my initial capitalization of the preposition and the article in the title Item From The Past; it should be Item from the Past…and yes, it does look a bit odd, When we first started running that feature  thirty-some years ago, without Microsoft breathing down my neck, it came out with all initial caps, the product of absentmindedness…and has continued just because readers are used to it (and it’s usually in all-caps). As a matter of fact, the Microsoft Grammar Checker is unhappy with a lot of the style that creeps in here…and while its help with typos and commas is welcome, much of the commentary is presented as if they were dealing with laws of nature, not malleable habits of language. Anything built into Windows is hugely influential, capable of constraining the language and style of whatever is written in our society. At last, absentmindedness in composition could be limited by law. 

 

Item:

Following a Correspo comment about the surging capacity and plunging price of commercial computer memory, Jake Mendelssohn said, “Recently I tried to buy some small (and cheap) USB Flash Drives. What I needed was 10 units with 500 MB each. I couldn’t find anything with less than 32 GB. I should not have thrown away my old obsolete drives.” Ray McKaig said, “I recently needed a USB Drive and bought a package of 2 for $20.  Each one had 1TB of storage, only $10 each.” Recall that according to Claude,A typical 60-minute audio cassette (30 minutes per side) could theoretically store around 54,000 bytes (about 54KB) when used at the Kansas City Standard's 300 baud rate”. That seemed like a whole lot of storage in the mid-1970s. 

_______________________________________________

ITEM FROM THE PAST

 

This item from 2006 comes to mind partly because

of the current fuss over the proposed merger of food

giants Kroger and Albertson’s and partly because of

a reported legislative triumph in Texas.

Item:

The issue of vanishing stores is with us again, as still-flourishing Safeways and Woolworths and their fellows are reported to us from various parts of the world. One reason for confusion is my now-being-corrected ignorance: Safeway, for example, has a whole lot of subsidiaries, including Von’s, Dominick’s, Pavilions, Randall’s, Tom Thumb, Genuardi’s, Carrs...and perhaps others. The disappearance of Safeway stores from a region doesn’t mean that the company is not represented by one or more of its subsidiaries. If you don’t track these things, it’s hard to know, and if you do track them on the web, you’ll find raging debate, seething with antagonism, resentment, calls for boycott, and ringing declarations of principle from customers, employees, shareholders, executives, politicians, and people who disapprove of preservatives, meat, refrigeration, sugar, and almost anything else. Nobody much cares if an art gallery is managed badly, because we can all stagger along for a few days without fresh paintings, but we can’t stagger for many days without food, and everybody has opinions about management of the food stores. It’s a tough racket from every point of view.

Friends and relatives in distant parts sometimes refer

to huge friendly neighborhood chain supermarkets of

which I’ve never heard, so I don’t claim expertise in

the matter. In New Mexico we hear a lot of complaint

about grocery store deserts, from which stores have

withdrawn, sometimes because they can’t keep up with

often violently aggressive shoplifting that depletes their

stocks and discourages employees from risking their

lives. (Back in phone booth days before everybody

carried a phone, constant vandalizing of the equipment

made it impossible for the phone companies to keep it

operating. When they’d remove a phone booth, the

company was typically condemned for greedy

indifference to the plight of the poor folks who depended

on such communications resources. Whatcha gonna do?

These days, of course, it is necessary only to persuade

any passing six-year-old to lend the use of his/her

several-hundred-dollar smartphone.)

Oh, and a report says that Texas has now become the

sixth state to forbid the sale of lab-grown meat in its

jurisdiction. If you’re lucky enough to have an

operating grocery store within reach, you’ll have to

settle for meat that has been swimming or walking

around (however closely constrained) on two or four

legs. One is now safe in the Longhorn State from

whatever threat lab-grown meat presents. It’s not clear

how long it will be before the Protective Six get around

to banning Solein, which may be more complicated,

because it’s produced by fermentation …the same

process used in making beer and cheese. Stay tuned.

Maybe stock up on beer.

 

August 2025

 

TELEVISION MIGHT HAVE AMOUNTED TO SOMETHING

We happened on a site called Old Television History, landing on a 1937 commentary about what was going on in the development of commercial television. The black and white technology was no longer just experimental, and radio networks NBC and CBS were hurrying to get on the air with regular broadcasts to the few thousand people in the U.S. who owned then very expensive television sets*…but wasn’t yet a commercial market. It’s startling to see how cloudy the future of television was in that era. You’ll see a recommendation that the market could be expanded by providing TV kits, and urging DIYers to build their own sets.  The folks involved in all this could tell that it was a new medium, not theater, not movies, not radio, but different, full of potential for something …goodness knew what. The first television I ever watched was in the Madison Avenue office of the Batten, Barton, Durstine, and Osborne ad agency during the last week of December 1946 when I was in NYC with my dad over Christmas vacation. One show we saw was You Are an Artist, with John Gnagy showing us how to draw. It was thrilling. On Old Television History you’ll see the kind of television set BBDO was using… the CRT mounted vertically in what looked like a radio console with the image reflected from a mirror on the uptilted lid. Television has come some way technically and socially since then. By the early 1960s, FCC Chairman Newton Minow was referring to television as “a vast wasteland” that had failed to live up to its potential… whatever it was. Here in mid-2025, commercial television is morphing into “streaming” as the networks are being supplanted by amateurs...anybody who can figure out how to use a computer with a camera online, or manage to punch the right tiny buttons on a smartphone. “Television” may have come and gone, and something different is going on.

*Twelve years later our family living in the NYC area with a

multitude of TV channels available (WNBC, WCBS, WABC

and WABD…the Allen B. DuMont channel that featured

comedian and cellist Morey Amsterdam) bought its first TV

set for four hundred 1949 dollars. It was a 10” RCA set that

must have weighed 80 pounds. It served us for about 8 years.

 

WHAT DO YOU MEAN “WE?”

Mitochondria seem to be much in the news in recent times…well, not in the tabloids, but certainly in the academic media and the popular technical/scientific publications. And by “much,” I suppose I mean that the subject has come up maybe twenty times in the last ten years. That seems like much for an outsider who is not actively looking for mitochondrial lore. What’s intriguing is that mitochondria are organs within living cells that appear to have been independent organisms at one time. They formed an interdependent relationship with another organism a zillion years ago, eventually merging physically with that other organism to form a new species. This idea was suggested, but not taken very seriously in the 1920s. Not until 1967 did Lynn Margulis first convincingly demonstrate and widely promote the notion, “later confirmed by genetic and biochemical evidence in the decades that followed” (according to ChatGPT). This sort of thing may have occurred more than once. For example, spirochetes may have linked up with other cells to form the cilia that many organisms use for propulsion.  A very recent report points to another likely example; a combination “taking nitrogen gas from the surroundings, which living things need to survive, and turning it into a form that could then be fashioned into proteins and DNA.” This is big stuff, potentially affecting agriculture on a huge scale. We commonly add large amounts of nitrogen fertilizer to crops We all learn in grammar school about “crop rotation,” alternating crops like turnips and oats with beans, both to avoid depletion of certain nutrients, and to add nitrogen back to the soil, helping make up for monoculture…growing the same crops in the same fields season after season. Legumes like beans have a particular relationship with other organisms that allows them to fix nitrogen in the soil, making it available to the other crops in turn. Crop rotation is helpful, but doesn’t feed the world. The discovery of the new organisms that are not part of the crop being raised, adding nitrogen where it’s needed, could be immensely important. But we’ll have to hold our breath; cool heads point out that it will probably take decades of intense study and work to develop and propagate this new performance. In the meantime, if you’d like to learn more about mitochondria, look for an interesting book (even I can read it without losing my place and having to look up the same terms repeatedly) called Brain Energy by Christopher M. Palmer MD, which is full of unexpected information.

Even as this piece was in progress, an article discussing

mitochondria appeared in one of the sites we check daily.

It even features a strikingly good photo of a mitochondrion.

(One wishes the kid well.)

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

NELS MUSES 

Item:

The Correspo has frequently commented on practical use of bioluminescent organisms. This report adds interestingly to the list of those applications, but an important takeaway here is that its practicality depended on the development of new camera technology not obviously related to biology. Interdependent technologies, developing in parallel, enable general progress. 

 

Item:

It was startling some years ago to see in the credits for a Pixar movie (Ratatuille, probably) a disclaimer saying that none of the images in the film were photos of real scenes; it was all CGI. That was a twist, because many of the images looked indeed as if they were either original photos or had been traced from photos. No code of transparency required such a declaration, so one supposes that they were bragging. Recently, we found this report, that real, live call center workers are being mistaken for AI-generated support personnel...and that’s a twist.

 

Item:

The piece above about historical television recalls the art of tuning a TV set in the old days. Every set had five knobs that needed adjustment to provide satisfactory viewing.

One was for power on/off and for sound volume.

A second was the channel selector…with twelve possibilities…far more than the actual number of TV channels anywhere.

A third was for adjusting the brightness of the image.

A fourth was for adjusting contrast in the image.

A fifth was mysterious. Nobody knew why, but it was necessary to fiddle with it to keep the image from flickering. In fact, the flicker was produced by the sound signal leaking into the video signal and modulating it annoyingly…a feature we used in the mid-sixties to allow transmission of information between parties who didn’t want to be seen in communication …discussed elsewhere. (It doesn’t work these days …at least not as conveniently…with TV sets that automatically make that puzzling adjustment.)

_______________________________________________

ITEM FROM THE PAST

 

This item from 2006 came to mind because we currently

see reports about “influencers” who have blogged their

way to fame, fortune, and sometimes disaster.

BLOGS AND ALL THAT

Spurred by Richard Wright’s comment that The ABQ Correspondent might be considered a “blog before there were blogs,” we got carried away, and added The Correspo to the list of blogs tracked by an organization called Technorati, just to see what might happen. We even added a bit of code to our HTML commands to display the report you see at the top left of this page. Not surprisingly, nothing happened. After 89 days, Technorati said, “Rank: 1,849,116 (No blogs link here).”

Well, why would any?

Fortunately, Jim Rapoza, a columnist for eWeek, recently published a piece called How to spot fake blogs...A real blog is much more than a site with little stories. The gist of his thoughtful analysis is that real blogs are highly interactive...with readers, with search engines, with content aggregators. A real blog maintains active links to other blogs, flattering them with attention, alerting them when new content is published, and tracking their activity, seeking information of importance to its own readers.

If the Correspo were a real blog, we would make it falling-down easy for any reader, anywhere in the world to add comments, make corrections, pick fights, refer readers to other sources of opinion on the same subjects, heap praise or scorn, and demand a whole lot of labor from its proprietor. Mr. Rapoza expresses the hope that his commentary provides a “good start to weeding out the real blogging tools from the wannabe website pages.” It does.

Gosh, blogging with all that hugger-mugger and confrontation doesn’t sound like much fun to the plodding, narrow-minded editor of The ABQ Correspondent. We’ll leave the Technorati link in place, just to detect any accidental activity, but will probably not plunge into the blogging waters of what reminds one of Paul Bunyan’s Great Onion River, which was circular, and just carried the logs around and around.

We never followed up with Technorati, which was

purchased a couple of years later, and still exists with

a different mission. We’re confident that with our half-

dozen readers the Correspo wouldn’t be classed as an

influencer, but it might be fun to see where we rank…

probably in the six or seven millionth spot. That would

be a reassuring relief.

It’s surprising to realize that back in the day the

influencers were the folks who ran or wrote for the

newspapers. William Randolph Hearst, for example,

is widely credited with starting the Spanish-American

War. Radio personalities were later influencers, and

so have been television personalities…often focused

on religion. In this Internet and Smartphone Age

it’s the bloggers and podcasters who seem to be the

filters through whom most of society receive the

attitudes with which they form their perception of

reality. It’s odd to think of W.R. Hearst, Father

Coughlin, the Kardashians, and Joe Rogan as a

related societal group.

--------------------------------------------------------------------

 Copyright © 2025 by ABQ Communications Corporation    All Rights Reserved