a 164 page paperback compilation of articles by JMW
$19.95
US list at Amazon
Click
here for Amazon.com
|
|
a 164 page paperback compilation of articles by JMW $19.95
US list at Amazon
|
In
recent years, I have wondered about some of the models engendered by those
fabled masters. What I have found is
that some, beautiful as they may be, are inherently limited.
They are limited because they fail to accommodate 3-D components that can
not be rendered from 2-D. The masters have decreed that things are different at
the atomic level even though this level formulates the substances of our real
world! This is a stretch of faith that I no longer accept.
Finding
the accepted electronic models unsatisfactory in explaining some of my own
experimental results, I set out a decade ago to find a model that would explain
them while remaining consistent with previous data. To do so, I had to think
outside the “box” created by the legends of science. My 3-D approach has
allowed me to see atoms from a different vantage point — a vantage point that
has gone unexplored since those mavens accepted OR-duality and electron
spin-reversal to justify homophilic cohabitation of orbital space by electron
pairs.
My
MCAS electronic model of atoms (published in "Challenging
Science" - "Simple Explanations to Some Complicated Science Enigmas")
demonstrates
that
1.
Atoms
are more like blocks than spheres. Thus, atoms can truly be called nature’s “building blocks”.
2.
Laws
that govern electrons at the atomic level are the same ones that govern them in
our macro-world. Electrons
do not possess “OR” duality (wave OR particle), but rather they possess
“AND” duality. In the absence of a model that allows things to be the same
at the atomic and macro-environments, it is perfectly reasonable to adopt one
that can be mathematically described. But as the MCAS model demonstrates,
electrons do NOT need to be different at the atomic level! Thus, it is quite
illogical to think otherwise.
3.
Electron-spin
predestined the predominant singular twist of natural molecules (i.e., DNA).
With a singular spin, electrons flow chirally around nuclei. Thus, electronic
orbitals possess built-in chirality. Atoms of the universe were the first to
have a one-way traffic system.
4.
The
electronic structure about an atom is dynamically flexible. As
more electrons surround a nucleus, more optimal packing arrangements must occur.
At speeds near that of light, electrons tune to each other’s velocity,
position, and charge to occupy observed energy states. The “uncertainty
principle” applies to man and his tools, not to electrons.
5.
Having
a mathematical description does NOT validate a model.
Degenerate, funny shaped orbitals (think dz2)
in the currently accepted model highlight the power of mathematics to model
anything and everything. With complete faith in mathematics, intellectuals no
longer revisit the reasons for its epicycles; any error is unthinkable.
Generations are duped as tons of scripture turn theory into law. Unbiased
introspection is lost, even as intellectuals are certain it is otherwise.
Heretics are just ignored by the powers that be and their views go unseen by the
masses.
6.
The
current quantum-mechanical model for electrons around atoms is NOT correct. The
quantum theoretical approach is validated by the photoelectric effect. It is the
nlms model that is not correct. The electronic cloud around a hydrogen atom is
NOT spherical; it is tetrahedral and chiral. Electrons of atoms retain their
velocity by interacting with the nucleus. Thus, they are nuclear powered.
